Jonathan R. Ratchik
Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik PLLC
Over two decades of experience devoted exclusively to the practice of personal injury law
Has recovered tens of millions of dollars on behalf negligence victims and their families
Frequent lecturer for New York State Trial Lawyers Association
Growing up, Jonathan Ratchik knew that he wanted to make a difference. To help people get back up when life knocked them down. To be their voice when no one seemed to listen or care.
In hindsight, it seems only natural that Jonathan went to law school and, after graduating, immediately became a personal injury attorney.
Jonathan lives in New York City with his wife, Hollie, and their two children. When he’s not fighting in the courtroom, Jonathan enjoys coaching his son’s little league team, listening to the Yankees on the radio, and being a great husband (and an even better dad). He’s also a proud supporter and volunteer for Transportation Alternatives, an advocacy group that is committed to making NYC a safer, more enjoyable place for all New Yorkers to walk, bike and live.
- Personal Injury
- Animal & Dog Bites, Brain Injury, Car Accidents, Construction Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, Premises Liability, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
- Medical Malpractice
- Birth Injury, Medical Misdiagnosis, Pharmacy Errors, Surgical Errors
- Free Consultation
- Contingent Fees
- New York
- New York State Office of Court Administration
- ID Number: 2856607
-
- 2nd Circuit
-
- United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
-
- United States District Court, Southern District of New York
-
- English: Spoken, Written
- Partner
- Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik PLLC
- - Current
- Partner
- Kramer & Dunleavy, LLP
- -
- American University Washington College of Law
- J.D. (1997) | Law
-
- New York University
- B.A. (1994) | Political Science, French
- Honors: cum laude
-
- Super Lawyers
- Thomson Reuters
- AV Preeminent
- Martindale-Hubbell Lawyers Service
- Selected: 2019-2020 Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence
- Client Champion - GOLD
- Martindale-Hubbell Lawyers Service
- New York State Trial Lawyers Association
- Current
-
- Association of the Bar of the City of New York
- Current
-
- New York State Bar # 2856607
- Member
- - Current
-
- Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1995
- American University Journal of International Law and Policy
- Ethics, Decisions 2015
- New York State Trial Lawyers Association
- Ethics, Decisions 2014
- New York State Trial Lawyers Association
- Ethics, Decisions 2013
- New York State Trial Lawyers Association
- Pleadings and Filings, Decisions 2012
- New York State Trial Lawyers Association
- Pleadings and Filings, Decisions 2010
- New York State Trial Lawyers Association
- Q. Is it legal to place a blank (no amount)social service 104 lien on my personal injury settlement in NY. Its a NF car acc
- A: There's nothing inherently illegal about leaving the figure blank, especially if your attorney does not know the amount of the lien. If you were a recipient of public assistance, NYS would have a statutory lien against the settlement proceeds which must be paid before the settlement proceeds are disbursed. Unfortunately, given staffing shortages, DSS has a significant backlog which means they often take months to resolve liens.
- Q. Side Mirror Case
- A: Be truthful. If GEICO is your insurance company, the statement you give to them will be confidential and non-discoverable in a lawsuit. That said, your statement will certainly affect GEICO's assessment of the claim and its apportionment of fault between you and the pedestrian, as will the statement you initially gave to the police at the scene.
- Q. Can I sue for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress or Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
- A: Sorry to hear what you're going through. Generally speaking, to bring an action for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, you need to demonstrate conduct that is "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community." Without minimizing what this person has done, it doesn't sound like her behavior rises to the level that would support a claim for negligent (or intentional) infliction of emotional distress.
